JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 22, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Juan Carlos Agudelo Tarazona Vs. Alcaldia Y Secretaria De Transito Y Transporte De Villavicencio Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura Del Meta, El Juzgado 5º Civil Municipal De Villavicencio Y El Juzgado 2º Civil Del Circuito De Villavicencio. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado 5º Civil Municipal De Villavicencio
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez
  • No le es dado modificar la solicitud presentada por la persona en el escrito de tutela ni excluir autoridades contra las cuales se dirigió la tutela
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado 5deg Civil Municipal de Villavicencio para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la accion de tutela de Juan Carlos Agudelo Tarazona contra la Alcaldia y la Secretaria de Transito y Transporte de Villavicencio, el Coordinador de la Septima Regional de Policia de Carreteras y la agente Francy Vargas, Grado Intendente.
  2. Segundo. Comunicar, por medio de Secretaria General, la presente sentencia al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Meta y al Juzgado 2deg Civil del Circuito de Villavicencio, con el fin de que tengan conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.